2006_Oct_National Security vs. Freedom of the Press

National Security vs. Freedom of the Press

Description

The Founding Fathers intended for the press to be a government watchdog and a protection against tyranny. Traditionally, the media enjoys special protection under the First Amendment, but in times of war, this freedom may be limited to protect national security. When government restrictions on press freedom become so significant that news outlets cannot accurately report on current events, this restriction has a chilling effect on the truth. At the heart of this competition between truth and safety is the question of what is best for the common good. Join Dean Nacht and Dean Schell as they discuss this question in light of current events.

Dates and Locations

San Diego

Oct. 24, 2006
The Prado at Balboa Park

Santa Monica

Oct. 25, 2006
Shutters on the Beach

Featuring

michael nacht 2

Michael Nacht

Nacht holds the Thomas and Alison Schneider Chair in Public Policy in the Goldman School of Public Policy. An expert in U.S. national security and foreign policy, and management strategies for public organizations, Nacht is the author or co-author of six books and more than 80 book chapters and jou…

More about Michael Nacht
orville schell

Orville Schell

Schell is the Arthur Ross Director of the Center on U.S.-China Relations at Asia Society in New York. He is a former professor and dean at Berkeley’s Graduate School of Journalism. Schell was born in New York City, graduated Magna Cum Laude from Harvard University in Far Eastern History, was an exc…

More about Orville Schell